Don't let us down this early

I mean, you're going to let us down at some point, Mr. President-elect. You're human. It's inevitable. But you don't have to do it this soon! I mean, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. as head of the EPA? How much more anti-science can you get than an antivaccine wingnut and a thimerosal /mercury conspiracy theorist?

As Orac points out:

...he has been launching despicable attacks against anyone who dares to call him for his antivaccine winguttery, accusing them of "hating mothers," all the while cherry-picking studies, conspiracy-mongering, and ignoring the great mass of evidence that does not support his viewpoint.

So what's the big deal? you say. EPA doesn't deal with vaccines.

True enough. But RFK, Jr. has demonstrated himself on this issue not only to be prone to dubious science, but to have become a true believer in one of the most outrageous and dangerous forms of pseudoscience out there: antivaccinationism, or vaccine rejectionism. If you're trying to build an administration ostensibly devoted to using the best science as the basis for public policy, and the EPA is one agency where that is incredibly important, you do not want someone who is so prone to pseudoscience and promoting misinformation not just when it comes to mercury in vaccines, but when it comes to the very area where he claims expertise, the environment, where he blames Katrina on global warming, for instance (not even Al Gore does that). Indeed, his assaults on fact and science are legendary, right up to describing the small Cuyahoga River fire (which lasted only 30 minutes and was never caught on film) as "exploding in colossal infernos." Apparently, any "science" is good to him, as long as it appears to support his agenda. Add to that his "not in my backyard" hypocrisy in opposing wind power proposal off of Martha's Vineyard, and it's hard for me to comprehend how Obama could consider him for a post even for a moment.

Let us at least pretend that we've got a pro-science president for a little while longer. *sigh* I guess the political machine wears you down quickly. I'll just keep my fingers crossed that he'll change his mind. Stranger things have been known to happen.

Link

I'm Sick

We all knew that, why is that news? This is not my usual mentally-sick sickness I'm talking about. You know, the sickness that manifests in inappropriate jokes, black humor, snarky comments, biting sarcasm, et al. No, my sickness this time is caused by a little thing known as a virus. I've got a cold flu black death. I'm dying. All right, technically we're all actively engaged in the process of dying. And the intellectual part of my brain is telling me that I'm not going to die anytime soon, much less because of this little bug. But that's not what my body says.

Except, viruses don't exist. The germ theory is an illusion. I have seen the light, and it comes in the form of the blinding stupidity of one Robert O. Young who tells us:

One must challenge everything in the modern construct of
immunology and what is said to be the immune system. The basis of modern immunology is founded on Louis Pasteur, the fraud, impostor, deceiver and self promoter. There is a serious problem to where every word and part of the anatomy must be questioned to find their use and function because of the fraud of Louis Pasteur.

I mean, how can one deny the brilliance of his logic when describing influenza:

For example, the word influenza means influence. Originally, influenza was said to come from the stars or heavens. The Avian Influenza is an influenza of a bird influence. More specifically, it is an influence of bird waste. The bird consumption industry in Southeast Asia is overcrowded to the point that the chickens are consuming their own waste, producing an over-acidification of the birds and workers that must work in the acidic air and waste.

It could be more accurately called Acidic Bird or Chicken Excrement Influenza that is only contagious to those consuming acidic birds, like chicken or breathing chemically altered air from chicken excrement. Because chickens do not have a urinary tract system, like humans and animals they are more likely to absorb their own acidic urine into their tissues. I guess you could say that's what makes chicken flesh or turkey flesh taste so juicy and why chicken or turkey flesh should never be consumed by humans!

Ahhh, the stupid, it burns more than the fever coursing through my body caused by the non-existant virus:

The word virus is originally Latin meaning poison, as in snake venom, (being too acidic). When a serious snake bite releases venom or acid into the skin and soft tissues, the small sweat vessels become so enlarged that red corpuscles can flow into the tiny seat glands, showing red skin patterns and allowing the venom or acids to escape through the skin. Acidity dissolves and enlarges blood vessels for the movement of acidic fluids or gases. Alkalinity constricts and normalizes the blood vessels.

The point being that viruses are molecular liquids or gases (venom) that can be created by chemical imbalances in humans, plants and animals (by malnutrition or toxic acidic food and/or drink consumption), also created in humans, plants and animal glands, sometimes used in defense (snake venom) or emergency (overactive adrenals), also can be crystallized in laboratories, rarely, if ever crystallized in vivo, and foolish to call viruses contagious when viruses are nothing more than acidic liquids or gases from biological transformation or rotting matter.

The brilliant "scientist" leaves us with these thoughts to ponder:

As you contemplate the cause of the flu, cold or any so-called infection, may I suggest that each of us take personal responsibility for the consequences of our choices, rather than blame a phantom Avian Influenza virus, cold virus, flu virus, cancer virus or some non-existent HIV virus. If you get sick, it is your own fault and not the cause of some phantom virus that you can blame to cover your own lifestyle and dietary transgressions. Save your money and save your life by making alkalizing and energizing lifestyle and dietary choices. This is where true immunity is found -- not in a vaccine or a drug which are all acidic and poisonous to the body but in living an alkaline lifestyle.

Sigh. So much for my attempts to lay the blame at the feet of microscopic little buggers for my illness. Instead it's because I had that glass of lemonade.

Many thanks to Orac for introducing me to the truth about germs.

Some confirmation of what I've suspected

I have been struggling to find some logical reason for the Republicans refusal to acknowledge reality. The hypocrisy displayed by the republican party this election cycle is just astounding. Even when they are flat-out proven wrong, the right-wing pundits keep spouting the same garbage.

Fortunately, I'm not the only one to notice. Jonah Lehrer of the blog "Frontal Cortex" has a good summary of this phenomenon:

I think this experiment helps explains a rather disturbing amount of our political discourse. What it neatly demonstrates is that the main reason so many campaigns traffic in dishonest allegations and pseudofacts is that, when it comes to voters, the facts don't really matter. Most of us are just partisan hacks:

Political scientists Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler provided two groups of volunteers with the Bush administration's prewar claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. One group was given a refutation -- the comprehensive 2004 Duelfer report that concluded that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction before the United States invaded in 2003. Thirty-four percent of conservatives told only about the Bush administration's claims thought Iraq had hidden or destroyed its weapons before the U.S. invasion, but 64 percent of conservatives who heard both claim and refutation thought that Iraq really did have the weapons. The refutation, in other words, made the misinformation worse.

A similar "backfire effect" also influenced conservatives told about Bush administration assertions that tax cuts increase federal revenue. One group was offered a refutation by prominent economists that included current and former Bush administration officials. About 35 percent of conservatives told about the Bush claim believed it; 67 percent of those provided with both assertion and refutation believed that tax cuts increase revenue.

In a paper approaching publication, Nyhan, a PhD student at Duke University, and Reifler, at Georgia State University, suggest that Republicans might be especially prone to the backfire effect because conservatives may have more rigid views than liberals: Upon hearing a refutation, conservatives might "argue back" against the refutation in their minds, thereby strengthening their belief in the misinformation. Nyhan and Reifler did not see the same "backfire effect" when liberals were given misinformation and a refutation about the Bush administration's stance on stem cell research.

I had to read this a few times to wrap my head around it. Basically, it shows that more people believed the lies after seeing proof of its fallacy than before. WTF?

He continues:

The Princeton political scientist Larry Bartels analyzed survey data from the 1990's to prove the same point. During the first term of Bill Clinton's presidency, the budget deficit declined by more than 90 percent. However, when Republican voters were asked in 1996 what happened to the deficit under Clinton, more than 55 percent said that it had increased.

Again with the denial of reality. Is this really so hard to comprehend:
Or how about this one? To difficult to process?

Yeah, right, "Drill, baby, drill". Graph from ::Architecture 2030

Anyway, back to the analysis:

What's interesting about this data is that so-called "high-information" voters - these are the Republicans who read the newspaper, watch cable news and can identify their representatives in Congress - weren't better informed than "low-information" voters. (The sole exception was Republicans who are ranked in the top 10 percent in terms of political information. As Bartels notes, it's only among these people that "the pull of objective reality begins to become apparent.") These citizens According to Bartels, the reason knowing more about politics doesn't erase partisan bias is that voters tend to only assimilate those facts that confirm what they already believe. If a piece of information doesn't follow Republican talking points - and Clinton's deficit reduction didn't fit the "tax and spend liberal" stereotype - then the information is conveniently ignored. "Voters think that they're thinking," Bartels says, "but what they're really doing is inventing facts or ignoring facts so that they can rationalize decisions they've already made." Once we identify with a political party, the world is edited so that it fits with our ideology.

Sigh. Still, I feel the need to keep preaching, even if it is only to the choir.

Post to del.icio.us | Digg this | Post to Furl

The Oh of Pleasure

The headline caught my eye, I must say:

Stroking reveals pleasure nerve

Thank you, Jenny Carpenter, Science Reporter for the BBC, for this hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism.

A new touch-sensitive nerve fibre responsible for the sense of pleasure experienced during stroking has been described at a UK conference today.

Oh, it gets better:

The nerves tap into a human's reward pathways, and could help explain why we enjoy grooming and a good hug, a neuroscientist has explained.

His team used a stroking machine to reveal the optimal speed and pressure for the most enjoyable caress. (emphasis mine)

I know a few people who would like to get their hands on that machine.

In order to isolate the touch-sensitive nerves responsible for the pleasure experienced during stroking, Professor McGlone designed a "rotary tactile stimulator" - a high-tech stroking machine.

"We have built some very sophisticated equipment, so the stimulus [of stroking] is very repeatable."

Now this is the kind of science I can get into! Unfortunately, the article goes on to destroy my hopes and dreams:

Professor McGlone points out that these touch nerves are not responsible for the pleasure experienced from rubbing sexual organs, nor are they found in a person's palms or soles.

Well, then, what's the point?

Post to del.icio.us | Digg this | Post to Furl

Science in da' house!

Since I've already introduced you to this science music, I figure I should broaden your horizons even more. It's especially appropriate today because they just fired up the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) this morning. Enjoy.

Hat tip to GrrlScientist for reminding me about the big event today and its musical significance.

Post to del.icio.us | Digg this | Post to Furl

Must... buy... epMotion

I'm not a scientist. It would be a real stretch to even try to classify myself as a computer scientist since I don't do any of that fancy theoretical-AI-quantum-researchy stuff. But I'm addicted to the Science Blogs. Some of the stuff is so far over my head that it's like a 6 foot tall person is holding it up and taunting me with it (I'm only 5' 5"). But one of my talents is the ability to pick up concepts based on context, so I can generally figure out what's going on.

At any rate, sometimes things pop up there that anyone can appreciate. Indeed, part of the mission over there at SB is to promote science education and accessibility. So even if you've never wielded a pipette in a lab, you should be able to appreciate this product marketing directed at our esteemed scientists working to make the world a better place.

I can't stop humming it. I haven't felt the need to watch a music video multiple times since I first found "White and Nerdy".


Via::Pharyngula

Post to del.icio.us | Digg this | Post to Furl

Tags: science, marketing, humor, advertising